Thoughts on Coltrane at 100

Two blog posts in a row about Coltrane, eh? This expansion on his influence was inspired by the 100th anniversary of his birthday, which was yesterday as I write this. Happy birthday Maestro, you truly are the GOAT.

-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-

Like so many British musicians, the beginnings of my relationship with jazz were quite deliberate. It wasn’t music that we were regularly exposed to in the general course of things. My middle school and high school had no jazz band, not even a big band. School music was orchestra or nothing. Jazz occasionally cropped up on TV, sometimes in the most unlikely places – Bruce Forsyth’s Count Basie-esque piano playing, Roy Castle’s prodigious trumpet skills. But we were reading about electric jazz musicians in music magazines. We were hearing talk of these amazing players, and in the context of that reading, we were introduced to ‘the greats’. We learned the names of the legends and then the vagueries of record availability took over.

I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity in my mid-teens to sit in regularly with a ‘New Orleans’ jazz band – Pete Roughead, a local trumpeter, was an obsessive regarding what he saw as the true New Orleans music. NOT, he would reiterate, Dixie, not the derivative, watered down stuff. The real shit. Louis Armstrong’s Hot Five and Hot Seven, George Lewis’ New Orleans Stompers. In that context I learned how to play walking bass, to outline the chords. No chromaticism allowed, but that foundation served me well in the years to come.

And the first electric jazz gig I ever saw was a line-up that years later I would understand was the absolute cream of what British electric jazz had to offer in the 80s – Jim Mullen, Mornington Lockett, Ian Thomas and an absolute bass giant who later became a good friend, Lawrence Cottle on bass. In a hotel room in Berwick On Tweed. No doubt funded by an Art Council Touring Grant, via Jazz Services.

As an avid record buyer, I started to look for jazz that made sense to me. And the first two jazz records I bought were Pat Metheny’s Question & Answer and Steve Berry’s trio – I had a real thing for trios. Around the same time, a friend’s mum gave me her collection of bebop best-of albums. Parker, Miles, Dizzie, Sonny Stitt… a whole stack of these collections of 1940s legends. I really wish I still had them. They were fascinating and a key part of me starting to get an ear for the music. But it still wasn’t MY music.

On the day of my (spectacularly failed) audition for Salford University in 1991, I went record shopping in a street market. I bought three albums – Bill Evans ‘Autumn Leaves’ (which was, I think, outtakes from Sunday At The Village Vanguard), Mingus Plays Duke, and Bye Bye Blackbird live in Europe by John Coltrane.

While the bebop records had fascinated me, I didn’t really connect with what I was hearing in terms of wanting to play it. But Scott Lafaro’s bass playing on Autumn Leaves absolutely captivated me, and the Coltrane record brought collective improv into an emotional space that compelled me. It opened a door.

Something about Coltrane’s searching, curious, open-ended approach to melodic exploration felt completely natural to me. It didn’t feel polished, refined, like multiple takes or too much rehearsal had happened. It felt like he was pouring his soul into the music and the musicians were hanging on for the ride.

As my interest in making music got more and more focused on signal processing, on sound design, I found myself drawn away from a lot of acoustic jazz, save for a handful of Miles records and that Coltrane album, until I bought Eric Nisenson’s Coltrane biography, ‘Ascension: John Coltrane and His Quest’. This wasn’t a dispassionate factual biography. It was a love letter to the music and the creative genius that made it. It plotted Coltrane’s music to the philosophical and spiritual questions he was searching out at the time. I seem to remember it describing the album Crescent as ‘one of those things that makes life worth living’ (Crescent remains one of my all time favourite ‘Trane records) and in the course of reading it I spent somewhere north of £120 buying each album as it came up in each chapter. Working through from Blue Train to Lush Life, Giant Steps, My Favourite Things to the albums with Ellington and Johnny Hartman, Africa/Brass, Live at Birdland, Coltrane, Crescent, Love Supreme, Stellar Regions, Interstellar Space…

And it was in this that I discovered an approach that has stuck with me ever since, that shapes every single thing I’ve done. While so many of my peers have spent decades digging into the harmonic insights in Giant Steps and the unmatched technical skill of that period of densely written, hugely energetic fast playing that perhaps peaked with Russian Lullaby, through the lens of Nisenson’s book I saw a path that took Coltrane from that relatively brief period of dense writing to one where the compositions were almost sketch-like, shapes and scratches of melody, simple structures that acted as a catalyst and a canvas for the unparalleled complexity and subtlety of improvisation. Hearing the band barely hanging on on the recording of Giant Steps left me largely cold – in spite of my deep love of the actual melody. But listening to Crescent and A Love Supreme, or Alabama, or Stellar Regions, hearing each musician bring their own voice, their interpretation their harmonic world to the table, hearing Elvin bend time and space, Jimmy Garrison manage to play some of the most incredible double bass playing in the history of jazz whilst being so locked in that he ended up being the most overlooked member of the classic quartet. Hearing McCoy take the harmonic innovations of Bill Evans and Miles in the late 50s and build a new world for Coltrane’s improvisations to exist in. It was that sense that the songs were a vehicle for all of that that shaped me. It was the fact that the composition could be almost anything and they would make it magic. My Favourite Things wasn’t a ‘standard’, it was a pop song that they quoted one bit of before branching out into an extended modal improv that bore no resemblance to the changes. It was a vehicle. The familiarity drew people in, gave the performance a hook and a shape, but was 2% of what made it magical.

Inside that world, Coltrane explored every aspect of his being through his horn. Pushing the technical possibilities of the instrument so far that the Tenor sax still hasn’t come out from under his shadow. Perhaps the most enduring kingdom in all of music. ‘Trane still reigns supreme. He explored music from around the globe, he experimented with line-up changes, doubling up instruments just as Ornette Coleman had – these weren’t gimmicks, they were attempts to find the context for a musical connection with the infinite.

But – and this is perhaps the part that I draw on even more than the simplicity of the frameworks for improv – they were all one, or at most two day sessions. These era – even century – defining records were recorded in one or two takes on a single day. Often with other sessions the day before or after. Their significance being a combination of otherworldly music and the attachment of story, narrative, context and marketing to particular recordings. The great lost album, Both Directions At Once, was recorded one day before the incredible album with singer Johnny Hartman. Wildly different recordings, adjacent sessions. A Love Supreme was recorded in two days, including a whole version of Acknowledgement with Archie Shepp on sax, and Art Davis on second bass. The sanctity of the quartet was an editing decision made later. Coltrane was just trying shit out, constantly.

The stakes were never higher or lower than playing the best music they had to bring on the day. These weren’t albums that were sweated over for years. The vast majority of Coltrane’s musical world was unrecorded, vast numbers of shows where ideas came and went, some discarded, some forgotten. Whole eras of his development that just wouldn’t fit on recording devices. There’s talk of him having played two hour versions of a single tune on some gigs. No recording device existed at the time that could capture that, and no medium to release it would come along for several decades. So what we have captured are snapshots of an improvised life. Singular studio and live performances, that exist in the scarcity of the availability of tape and mics and recording devices, set up in such a way that the ferocity of Elvin’s drums and Coltrane’s sax didn’t just overload all the preamps to the point where the document was unusable and was therefor recorded over with whatever the engineer needed to do next. No-one was anticipating tools to clean up terrible recordings.

The history of improvised music is told through the lens of editors, of A&R people, engineers and release schedules, its aesthetics are shaped by the sometimes fraught relationship between the ephemerality and situationality of improvised musics and the varying degrees of austerity and sterility in recording studios. If the greatest performance of A Love Supreme was a show that no-one was recording, we’ll never know. If a mistake transformed a composition one night and it became the new version, we’ll never know.

So, in short, I owe a vast, vast amount of what I see as possible in music, of what I see as the purpose, the journey, the search for a voice and for meaning, for connection with transcendence, to Coltrane and his influence. Or rather, to what I’ve inferred from the documentary record. From the recordings, the interviews, the books, the stories. From that I was able to find the unparalleled beauty of the recordings, the inspiration in the journey and the progression, and the sense that his quest was one that I could codify into a journey that made sense to me. Not in some lofty sense, but in a deeply pragmatic need for forward motion:

Make music every day, capture as much of it as possible, create space for miracles to occur, invite other musicians to do whatever it is that they do best, hold lightly to the role of composer or instigator, iterate and get as much of the good stuff into the world as you can. Then do it again. And again. And again. Nostalgia is comfort for other people once you’re dead. Keep moving forward.

Thoughts on Being Prolific – Lessons From John Coltrane.

(This is the first time in many, many years that I’ve reproduced a ‘tweet-thread’ on the blog. Only this time, it’s from Bluesky, not that other hellscape. For those of you who are new-ish round here, I used to quite often brainstorm on Twitter, then move it over here. I’m not known for my brevity, but the Twitter format made me process things in a different, less rambling way. So here’s that:)

just found this amazing chronological list of everything Coltrane ever recorded:

https://rateyourmusic.com/list/wizardjoe/john-coltrane-a-complete-life-and-recorded-chronological-discography/

Coupla things worth noting: Continue reading “Thoughts on Being Prolific – Lessons From John Coltrane.”

The Illusion Of Genre – a post from 2009

The following thoughts were posted to Facebook, back when there was a quasi-blogging function built in. I’m not going to edit them, as it’s more interesting to me to log where my thinking about things was at at various times in my development – I imagine that this was around the time I started to describe my music as ‘cinematic instrumental’ as a way of avoiding genre conversations – so read what 36 year old Steve thought about genre 🙂
___________________________________
(Aug 8th 2009)

Continue reading “The Illusion Of Genre – a post from 2009”

Some Thoughts on the Joy of Surprising Myself

(originally posted on Facebook on July 23rd, 2024 – this came up in my FB memories and fits so well with the processes around making these four new albums that are about to be released…)

Some thoughts on the joy of surprising myself 🙂

One of the joys of being an improvisor is that my own music surprises me all the time. Let me explain…

If you write songs and make recordings of those songs, there’s usually a sense of what those songs are supposed to sound like. Sometimes that sense is INCREDIBLY precise and a huge amount of time and energy and money goes into making it sound exactly the way the artist and/or producer envisage it sounding. Other times it’s a little looser and the musicians that play on it bring surprises and new stuff to the process, but what they do still usually fits within the shape of the song as it was intended (not always, but usually). So listening back to it mostly happens with the anticipation of what it sounded like when you went through the hundreds of listens while the track was being constructed under a microscope. (this wasn’t always the way, at all, and you’d be amazed at how many of your favourite records from before approx 1985, and a few after, were mostly one take backing tracks and one take vocals – recording a lead vocal at the same time as the band has been a rarity since the 60s unless it was a literal ‘live’ recording and labeled as such). The joy is in making a thing that lives up to the vision you had for it. It’s an incredible process that I’ve been involved in countless times and is also the process behind most of my favourite music in the world.

But I’ve heard significant numbers of artists say in interviews that they rarely if ever listen to their own recordings because they never live up to the vision they had for the recording in their head as it was being made. Everything is a disappointment. Sometimes those are records that changed my life, and the artist still feels like ‘nah, that’s not what I had in mind’ 🤷🏽

So when I get to ‘just play’, to hit record and see what comes up, sometimes only moments after adding or changing something about the pedal board – sometimes big changes, sometimes subtle ones – the music that comes out is entirely new to me. It has the familiarity of being born from the combination of my interests, skills, the things I’ve practiced and the things I’ve perfected over the years, but the combination of elements especially considering all the ways in which I build intentional surprises into the pedal-board are always new and are always far too complex in their relationship to one another for me to remember them with any degree of clarity once they’re ‘done’.

Which means that I get to listen to my own work repeatedly and be surprised by it over and over again. The music itself gets to be way more complex than it would be if I were trying to write parts that I could play the same way repeatedly (sure, it’s possible to go down the Boulez/Zappa route and conceive of and write shit that was insanely complicated and get expert musicians to play it repeatedly, but it’s so, so far from anything I’m interested in as a fan or creator that we’ll leave that to one side for now 😉 )

If things are being recorded, I can play them once in all their glorious complexity and that’s it, done. There are no edits, no ‘fixes’, no new layers added, no mistakes taken out. There is no ‘should’ only ‘is’. What you hear is what I did, and what I hear is what I did as well. Perpetual surprise and delight, as well as the inspiration to build on what one-month-ago-me did as well as what two-decades-ago me did.

140+ albums in, I’ve got a body of work that’s unknowably huge – there’s a ton of it you could play me and I couldn’t for the life of me tell you what it was called or which album it came from. But all of it offers up beautiful surprises every time I listen. And for that I’m deeply grateful 🙂 x

(I’m also, before anyone comments, hugely grateful for songwriters, especially those who include me in their songwriting and recording adventures, so this isn’t a matter of one way being ‘better’, it’s just the perfect path for my solo work).

Subsidised Teaching Slots Now Available

As we head into the spring, I’ve finally got round to implementing a thing I’ve been meaning to do for ages – making four one-hour lessons a week available at a lower rate than my usual teaching rate, for people who can’t otherwise afford it or would otherwise struggle to access music tuition.

So, if you’re a full or part-time student, if you’re a full time musician who’s just trying to work on their craft while hustling to pay the bills, if you’re a disabled musician, from a minority background, unemployed or on a low wage, send me a message and we’ll see if we can work something out. It’ll be on a sliding scale, depending on the circumstances.

Lessons can be weekly, every other week, or monthly, and can be scheduled for either daytime or evenings. As well as bass, I offer tuition in improvisation and looping/live sound design. 

If you’re interested in lessons and aren’t in the category for subsidy, that’s OK too – just head to my teaching page for more info and we’ll get you booked in 🙂

Thoughts on the Purpose and Effectiveness of Protest Marches

OK, before reading or watching this from me, I’d recommend reading Dr Stacey Patton’s thoughts on this both on her Facebook and on Substack. She’s has a PhD in African American History, and has studied protests as part of her work. So yeah, way more qualified than me to speak on this…

This is part 1 of two versions of basically the same idea – the other one is a video that’ll be in the post after this (once I’ve got it off my phone and uploaded it to Flickr) with a transcript…

But here’s the blog post I wrote initially as a script for a video, but realised I was no good at reading scripts so just freestyled the video and ended up with two versions 🤷🏽

_O_O_O_O_O_O_O_O_

I’ve been thinking about protest marches, and in particular yesterday’s march against The Far Right.

I think it’s important to define what it is, ultimately, that we are marching against. I think it comes down to three things:

  • Patriarchy
  • White Supremacy
  • Capitalism

The “far right” and even fascism are labels for the impolite manifestations of the above. As a number of scholars have suggested on social media, fascism can perhaps be best understood as a method, rather than an ideology. A brand of violent authoritarian control that can be attached to any or all of the above. So while there is absolutely a resurgent far right in British electoral politics, the “far right” behaviour that well-meaning liberals are now marching against has been there all along, it’s just that now it’s impacting white people.  Continue reading “Thoughts on the Purpose and Effectiveness of Protest Marches”

The Tyranny of the Algorithm

I’ve been posting video over on Instagram and Facebook over the past few weeks, talking about some ideas around music and social media, with an unsurprising emphasis on audiences.

I’ve been trying to work out where the best place to host them for longer term access is, and realised that Flickr will host video up to 10 minutes, so have put this on my account there to test this out. Here’s some thoughts on why Social Media algorithms interfere with the way we communicate as musicians with our audience… Would love to know your thoughts in the comments x

The Tyranny of the Algorithm"

(here’s a transcript, for those who can’t do video – loosely edited from the autogenerated closed captions in the Edits App…)

Why do we have to talk weird just to have a conversation with our audience?

This is a thing I like to think of as the tyranny of the algorithm. Or it could easily be Pavlov’s algorithm, because the algorithm that decides what people get to see sorts it based on a bunch of really, really bizarre criteria.

What happens is that there’s this drip drip effect on the way that people talk, the way they present, the way they manipulate video in order to expand their audience and their reach

But what dies in that is.. Nuance is expansive cultural expression is the opinions of people who are unsure that everybody is wildly confident and comes across as though they’re just making these massively declarative statements about the world and edits out all the gaps see me i’m stumbling on my words because i’m not this isn’t scripted i’m just chatting and

And I think part of it is that we’ve lost the joy of not going viral. I don’t want this or anything else that I do particularly to go viral. I want to reach people who actually want to have a conversation, I want to reach the people that I already know. Even reach is kind of an odd word – I just want to have a conversation. I don’t talk about reaching people by going outside. I don’t reach my students. I just talk to them.

But we have this really odd relationship with the robots that intervene between us and the people who might get to see what we do, so we’re making video – and music as well, but that’s a whole other question – we’re making video and editing pictures to please robots because they might then go and show them to humans.

That’s a mess! That’s a total mess we shouldn’t be doing that.

I’m gonna try and do more video on here and I hope that you get to see it if you are watching this you’ve got this far what with two minutes 15 into this if you get if you’ve got this far please do go and join the channel on my Instagram page I don’t post it very often but I will forward these kind of things to it so you actually get it as a message I’m not going to abuse that I’m not gonna I’m not I have no interest in posting to it honestly daily basis, I don’t think that’s a really healthy thing to do because your attention should be elsewhere. I don’t need and I certainly wouldn’t thrive on you sitting there waiting for me to post nonsense on Instagram every day

However, I do want to have a conversation and I’m not going to suddenly start shaking my phone in front of my face in order to convince a robot that somehow I’m exciting, I’m not going to put makeup on as a performative thing, I just, I suppose it’s important to say at this point, no shade on the people who do – I get that if, for whatever reason, content creation is how you make your money, pay your bills, or get a political point across. I get why you’re doing that, but I’ve always had a problem with the reduction in what, the metaphor that I always use is biodiversity

Our options are narrowing, that content is all becoming more of the same and that people won’t work ideas out in public anymore because everyone’s declaring their truth and we sort of surf between ever more shouty whatever. I don’t like the idea that we are getting like that.

and you’ll notive I’m not holding a microphone – I’m not sat here with something like a tin of sugar free mints talking to it like it’s a microphone. Maybe I should, maybe then the algorithm will start to listen to me… I don’t want the algorithm to listen to me!

My camera has a mic built in, my phone does, I’m sat in a very quiet room in my hose. It’s fine.

Anyway feel free to reply to this either in the channel or int he thing if you’re more interested in having a conversation than you are in having people shout at you and pummel you in the face with their big hot takes while shaing their camera and editing it to shit

Everything Is Synthetic

This is a FB post from Feb 13th 2014 , it just came up on my stories and felt worth sharing here.

It has implications for those of us who teach and our conversations around influence and originality, how we guide students towards the ingredients of their best artistic self.

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

some thoughts bobbling around inside my head this evening.

Everything is synthetic.

At least, in the sense that word means ‘born of synthesis’. Language, ideas, art, progress, stories… the degree to which we fetishise the false notion of ‘originality’ as an objective reality, and as desirable over and above the thing itself, is not helpful. At all.

Let go: if a thing looks or feels ‘original’ it just means that no one of its constituent influences is more apparent than any other. Or that you haven’t experienced those things that influenced it. The perception of originality is a subjective observational position, not an extant embedded reality in ‘the thing’.

We build ourselves from the beauty and strangeness around us, choosing to process the things we see and experience towards our own end. Make great things with what you have, don’t freak out about the things that aren’t in your palette for building YOU. Seek out the experiences, situations, people and influences that will make you the person you need to become. None of those require fame/success/riches. All are contextual, everything is meaningful.

Being an extraordinary stay-at-home parent is way more impressive/important than being a mediocre stadium rock superstar. the metrics of synthesis are about What You Do With What You Have. And even then, the perception of those things is wholly subjective.

But let go of the pressure for everything to be new! exciting! original! unique!

Instead, be good. Be kind. Be Generous. Be thoughtful. Take every opportunity to make the world better for those around you.

No-one Should Ever Play Like They Are in an Exam

One thing that I’ve been adamant about for the almost 30 years that I’ve been teaching in music colleges is that no student should ever play like they’re in an exam. The idea that the skills and awareness that they are accumulating through study should be presented merely as a demonstration of those skills to an examiner is a massively missed opportunity to frame every assessment opportunity contextually.

This has been part of how I teach bass privately for decades, to put any exercise in a context as soon as possible – to take a technical exercise away from the realm of ‘is this correct’ and into the aesthetic space of ‘is this good?’ as soon as possible, returning to the more analytical space when the contextual work reveals areas of weakness or a lack of clarity over elements of the work.

So back to exams – the work that we as teachers, tutors, lecturers put in to help the students towards true excellence is vital to the students finding the inspiration to develop a practice that doesn’t just pass assessment criteria but puts art out into the world that is worthy of attention and an audience. Every specific set of assessment criteria is an invitation to contextualise, to talk about what this means to us as creative practitioners, as professionals, as collaborators, as artists with an audience and engaged in the work of audience development. Without that context, we’re robbing them of the meaning behind the attention they’re giving to their practice.

The reasons for this are both obvious and manifold. Art produced solely to pass an exam is literally worthless, on a metaphysical level. What a moribund aspiration it is to aim solely to pass an assessment. The assessment should be a benchmark against which to measure a performance, a composition, an interpretation, the demonstration of ability to execute music to a high standard, but it’s the performance that matters, the composition that matters.

At the beginning of every new academic year I invite my students to be ‘open to the possibility of greatness’. Not as a pressure, but as a moment of recognition that greatness doesn’t happen by accident, and the journey towards it is what makes both education and creative practice worthwhile. There is zero value in intentional mediocrity.

So in what way is your work an invitation to the possibility of greatness? How are you shepherding them towards an understanding of both what it takes to be great, and what the payoff is of that work? The metaphysical purpose of showing up as your best self in a world that will so often attempt to rob you of your originality and value.

Like every area of education in the UK and beyond, music education is facing pressures of privatisation, economic extraction and the collapse of the journey of critical thinking that ought to begin in school and extend to PhDs and beyond… But while we’re in a room with a bunch of students, our task is still to try and inspire and guide them towards making meaning in the world. Anything less is a travesty.

So back to our initial frame – it’s imperative that every assessment is presented as an opportunity to develop practice, to perform, to imagine an audience and play to them. Practically this means thinking about staging, costume, introductions, entrances, exits. Make this a part of everything. There’s no reason not to.

And the associated benefit for us? We get to think about what makes OUR work meaningful, how do we perform? What are we doing to inspire them? Everybody wins.

Live Recordings, Studio Recordings and the Presence of the Audience

The words below were posted to Facebook in January 2019, and are useful as an example of how my thinking about audience developed and nuanced over time. The end point of my PhD is that the subscriber audience are always present in my decision making as a non-present intended audience. The notion presented here that studio recordings are ‘for me’ is challenged, and evidenced in the commentary on the recordings that comprise the practice submission for the PhD. Anyway, there’s some good stuff in here regarding the impact of the live audience. Enjoy 🙂

Jan 16th 2019
My recorded output is divided sharply into live and “studio” recordings. The equipment and audio process are identical for them both but the presence of a live audience completely changes the experience. When I’m in the studio (such a professional sounding euphemism for “the corner of the bedroom”) my audience is me, my aesthetic decisions, my moment to moment assessment of what needs to happen to is made in relation to my own taste, in dialogue with my own history, with whatever I’ve been working on and the lingering shadows of whoever has been inspiring me of late.

But live, the audience are present on the music. I interpret their presence, I respond to who’s there, to the sounds and gestures that I’m aware of while playing, and to my projected imagining of what their experience is like. I play to them, and for them but also with them and I become them, projecting my own understanding of what my experience would be were I not the one with a bass in my hands…

Listening back to any recording is a fascinating exercise in time-shifting the audio record of that moment, live or studio, and re-experiencing it with its own extant nature as a factor instead of the sense of possibility that exists in the unfolding.

So recordings are a translation of that experience and its quite possible for something to “work” on the moment but not as a recording or vice versa to feel like a failure live and then blossom under scrutiny.

I’ve been listening to my latest solo album on the way to work this morning, which is without doubt my favourite thing I’ve ever recorded. It’s also the most “successful” thing I’ve released in many many years. I was trying to remember the experience of improvising it all and some of the performances are still vivid in my mind (aided by the video that exists on YouTube of the actual recordings)

Anyway, if you want to hear it, it’s here –
http://music.stevelawson.net/album/beauty-and-desolation – just remember that, first time through, you share the sense of becoming that I had as it emerged in the moment. Second time through, you’re experiencing something wholly new – improvised music that now exists in relation to the memory of itself.

Top