<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on File Sharing&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/</link>
	<description>the soundtrack to the day you wish you&#039;d had</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2007/10/thoughts-on-file-sharing/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>It is certainly a farce that the world&#039;s biggest download store is selling 128kbps MP3s for as much money as they are. I mean, it&#039;s cool for the indies cos it means we can easily measure ourselves against them and be cheaper and better, but it&#039;s crap for the consumer, because most people are herded towards buying from iTunes (the interface and whole idea of it is great, it&#039;s just the bitrate and DRM that sucks).

What we really need is a way of attaching proper viewable artwork and sleevenotes to MP3s, to complete the artistic/creative side of things... I&#039;ll have to give that one some thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly a farce that the world&#8217;s biggest download store is selling 128kbps MP3s for as much money as they are. I mean, it&#8217;s cool for the indies cos it means we can easily measure ourselves against them and be cheaper and better, but it&#8217;s crap for the consumer, because most people are herded towards buying from iTunes (the interface and whole idea of it is great, it&#8217;s just the bitrate and DRM that sucks).</p>
<p>What we really need is a way of attaching proper viewable artwork and sleevenotes to MP3s, to complete the artistic/creative side of things&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to give that one some thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James White</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>James White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2007/10/thoughts-on-file-sharing/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I love what Radiohead have done. Personally my house is littered with CDs that I dont know what to do with as I&#039;ve ripped them all to my computer and have no use for them. They are keeping both camps happy by releasing both the box and download version.
There are a few reasons why I have bought CDs rather than downloads. The first is DRM, this is evil and should be chucked. If I buy some music I should be able to do what I want with it, this means listening to it on whatever device I want and (controversally) lending it to a friend to introduce them to a new artist.
The second is bitrate, most people are catching up now that 128kbps mp3s dont cut the mustard. As soon as more DRM-free mp3/aac files at 192kbps (like your site) are available I won&#039;t buy CDs anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I love what Radiohead have done. Personally my house is littered with CDs that I dont know what to do with as I&#8217;ve ripped them all to my computer and have no use for them. They are keeping both camps happy by releasing both the box and download version.<br />
There are a few reasons why I have bought CDs rather than downloads. The first is DRM, this is evil and should be chucked. If I buy some music I should be able to do what I want with it, this means listening to it on whatever device I want and (controversally) lending it to a friend to introduce them to a new artist.<br />
The second is bitrate, most people are catching up now that 128kbps mp3s dont cut the mustard. As soon as more DRM-free mp3/aac files at 192kbps (like your site) are available I won&#8217;t buy CDs anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin buckland</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin buckland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2007/10/thoughts-on-file-sharing/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d much rather have the &#039;real&#039; CD and associated artwork than a download.
I don&#039;t own any downloads, or copied CDs.
I really like the tracks that I&#039;ve heard from your new album, but I don&#039;t want to download it, I&#039;d rather buy a proper CD to add to my collection, I like to read the liner notes etc. while listening to it, maybe I&#039;m just old fashioned or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much rather have the &#8216;real&#8217; CD and associated artwork than a download.<br />
I don&#8217;t own any downloads, or copied CDs.<br />
I really like the tracks that I&#8217;ve heard from your new album, but I don&#8217;t want to download it, I&#8217;d rather buy a proper CD to add to my collection, I like to read the liner notes etc. while listening to it, maybe I&#8217;m just old fashioned or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2007/10/thoughts-on-file-sharing/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>According to the Guardian, Radiohead yesterday sold more copies of the (£40) box set than the (potentially less than £1) download, which is quite amazing.

But one thing definitely in Radiohead&#039;s favour is their track record of making special editions worthwhile. They hid extra booklets in some copies of Kid A (and finding one before the news was out that they&#039;d done that was a good experience). There was the map they sent out with another album. And crucially, the hidden special features tend to be closely linked with the artistic vision of the records.

So fans know that if they pay for the box set, the book they get won&#039;t be some cheap thing designed to dupe us, it&#039;ll be an interesting piece we&#039;ll probably spend quite a bit of time with. The extra CD will probably be pretty good, not a load of rough cuts of the band being goofy in the studio. And so on.

In other words, Radiohead have done enough to build trust with their fans, that people are willing to risk a lot more money than they would on some band whose new album might amount to a few good tunes if we&#039;re lucky. And that gives them license to try something like this.

So... how should a new artist--who hasn&#039;t had time to build that level of trust--react to that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Guardian, Radiohead yesterday sold more copies of the (£40) box set than the (potentially less than £1) download, which is quite amazing.</p>
<p>But one thing definitely in Radiohead&#8217;s favour is their track record of making special editions worthwhile. They hid extra booklets in some copies of Kid A (and finding one before the news was out that they&#8217;d done that was a good experience). There was the map they sent out with another album. And crucially, the hidden special features tend to be closely linked with the artistic vision of the records.</p>
<p>So fans know that if they pay for the box set, the book they get won&#8217;t be some cheap thing designed to dupe us, it&#8217;ll be an interesting piece we&#8217;ll probably spend quite a bit of time with. The extra CD will probably be pretty good, not a load of rough cuts of the band being goofy in the studio. And so on.</p>
<p>In other words, Radiohead have done enough to build trust with their fans, that people are willing to risk a lot more money than they would on some band whose new album might amount to a few good tunes if we&#8217;re lucky. And that gives them license to try something like this.</p>
<p>So&#8230; how should a new artist&#8211;who hasn&#8217;t had time to build that level of trust&#8211;react to that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2007/10/thoughts-on-file-sharing/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>An interesting debate Steve. I think there is a snense that music fans in general have felt ripped off by the price of CDs in the past, citing &#039;Rip Off Britain&#039; as a main factor. I  feel that there is some sense in what you say about the perception of &#039;Major Artists. (in whatever form) having loads of money, so a few downloads here and there is just helping to spread the wealth a bit. After all, a serious music fan will have collected a lot of music in a physical format over the years, so surely that justifies an illicit download here and there?

Of course that argument is untenable really, as it then becomes the small truly independent artist , like yourself, who really cant afford to get ripped off, gets ripped off. In that sense it really does make me personally think and want to support the small but perfectly formed independent artist by buying CD&#039;s and attending gigs, in your case catching up with seeing you at Greenbelt, which I try to do. (&#039;ere steve, when are you going to do a gig in the west country? I know you were here in Bath at the forum for a workshop!)
Being old fashioned, i do like something phhysical to hold onto, like a CD and would much prefer to buy that than have a download. Having said tha, Your idea re Lessons learned is great, and I have to admit to buying the one I didnt have. I would like a reissue on CD though!
Keep going Steve you&#039;re producing valuable and worthwhile, wonderful music!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting debate Steve. I think there is a snense that music fans in general have felt ripped off by the price of CDs in the past, citing &#8216;Rip Off Britain&#8217; as a main factor. I  feel that there is some sense in what you say about the perception of &#8216;Major Artists. (in whatever form) having loads of money, so a few downloads here and there is just helping to spread the wealth a bit. After all, a serious music fan will have collected a lot of music in a physical format over the years, so surely that justifies an illicit download here and there?</p>
<p>Of course that argument is untenable really, as it then becomes the small truly independent artist , like yourself, who really cant afford to get ripped off, gets ripped off. In that sense it really does make me personally think and want to support the small but perfectly formed independent artist by buying CD&#8217;s and attending gigs, in your case catching up with seeing you at Greenbelt, which I try to do. (&#8216;ere steve, when are you going to do a gig in the west country? I know you were here in Bath at the forum for a workshop!)<br />
Being old fashioned, i do like something phhysical to hold onto, like a CD and would much prefer to buy that than have a download. Having said tha, Your idea re Lessons learned is great, and I have to admit to buying the one I didnt have. I would like a reissue on CD though!<br />
Keep going Steve you&#8217;re producing valuable and worthwhile, wonderful music!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Creedy</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelawson.net/2007/10/thoughts_on_fil/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Creedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2007/10/thoughts-on-file-sharing/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>I bought the Calamateur Vs. Steve Lawson download this morning (v good indeed) and intend to buy the Radiohead download when it&#039;s available.

I&#039;ll happily pay something similar to what I pay Napster for downloads (£8.95 for most new albums, I paid that for downloading Joni Mitchell&#039;s new one) though if the material was more like The Bends or OK Computer, I&#039;d happily pay more ;O)

I have also bought CD copies of albums which I already own on vinyl, because I do like the physical ownership of albums too.

Having said all of that, I do have a sizeable number of less than legally obtained MP3s, so I&#039;m no saint, and I&#039;m not averse to checking out artists I&#039;m either unaware or uncertain of before considering spending some money, though I do sometimes buy CDs without having heard anything, if they&#039;ve been recommended by someone who&#039;s opinion I respect.

I do buy CDs from people I see live where possible, as I like to support people who are not just chasing the big bucks, and recognise that for many of them CD sales are an important part of their income.

That doesn&#039;t mean that an artist or band signed to a major label is fair game for stealing their product, but if I&#039;m honest, I&#039;m probably not as uncomfortable about it if that&#039;s the case.

It&#039;s ok for Radiohead to try something like this, because they don&#039;t need the publicity a record company&#039;s money can give them - I&#039;ve seen mention of the new Radiohead album on just about every net site I visit - in the same way, Prince&#039;s selling of his album to a national Sunday newspaper worked because people already knew who he was, if my band did the same as Radiohead I doubt anyone would know it had happened ;O)

(in fact I&#039;m sure of it - we had some recent studio recordings free to download from our myspace page and I don&#039;t recall a single comment about it, though I&#039;m sure some did download the songs)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the Calamateur Vs. Steve Lawson download this morning (v good indeed) and intend to buy the Radiohead download when it&#8217;s available.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll happily pay something similar to what I pay Napster for downloads (£8.95 for most new albums, I paid that for downloading Joni Mitchell&#8217;s new one) though if the material was more like The Bends or OK Computer, I&#8217;d happily pay more ;O)</p>
<p>I have also bought CD copies of albums which I already own on vinyl, because I do like the physical ownership of albums too.</p>
<p>Having said all of that, I do have a sizeable number of less than legally obtained MP3s, so I&#8217;m no saint, and I&#8217;m not averse to checking out artists I&#8217;m either unaware or uncertain of before considering spending some money, though I do sometimes buy CDs without having heard anything, if they&#8217;ve been recommended by someone who&#8217;s opinion I respect.</p>
<p>I do buy CDs from people I see live where possible, as I like to support people who are not just chasing the big bucks, and recognise that for many of them CD sales are an important part of their income.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that an artist or band signed to a major label is fair game for stealing their product, but if I&#8217;m honest, I&#8217;m probably not as uncomfortable about it if that&#8217;s the case.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ok for Radiohead to try something like this, because they don&#8217;t need the publicity a record company&#8217;s money can give them &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen mention of the new Radiohead album on just about every net site I visit &#8211; in the same way, Prince&#8217;s selling of his album to a national Sunday newspaper worked because people already knew who he was, if my band did the same as Radiohead I doubt anyone would know it had happened ;O)</p>
<p>(in fact I&#8217;m sure of it &#8211; we had some recent studio recordings free to download from our myspace page and I don&#8217;t recall a single comment about it, though I&#8217;m sure some did download the songs)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

